![]() |
| St. Georg. Nördlingen. |
![]() |
| Nürnberg. A postcard corner. |
![]() |
| St. Georg. Nördlingen. |
![]() |
| Nürnberg. A postcard corner. |
After a long time (more than two years), I packed for some days off, not on vacation, but for attending an Austrian conference in Leoben. It was a strange feeling thinking of what I might need in a hotel. When I visit my parents in Italy, I don’t need many tools, almost everything is doubled at my parents’ place. Now, I need a pyjama, toot brush, etc. In addition, I had to take with me the hated poster tube.
Trustful to my (green) tradition, I travelled by train, enjoying the beautiful but slow moving landscape at Semmering. The hotel, close to the former Abbey Göss (and the Gösser Brewery), was lovely. From my window, I could see the river Mur and a large gold quarry in between dark green woods. Again in a hotel after so much time. The first night, I couldn’t sleep, not because I was excited or because the room was noisy, but because I wasn’t used anymore to change bed. I’m getting old.
![]() |
| Historical town hall in Leoben |
The conference has been organized by the Austrian Geological Society (and the Austrian Mineralogical Society, as well) at the University of Leoben, a relatively young (since 1840) technical university. The organization was outstanding, the location was easily reachable and the lecture halls comfortable. Lunches and coffee breaks (starting with a morning coffee and sweets) were included in the registration fee and were provided by the local cafeteria. Not bad at all. Even though I skipped the overcrowded social dinner, I enjoyed much the icebreaker party, attended by just a few people. The quality of talks was quite high, there was room for opposite interpretations, without strong fights (Austrians are not Italian). Except for an entertaining public lecture, everything was in English. The University of Leoben hosts several international students, but it was also a pleasure to realize that I’m not the only non-German-speaking senior scientist (not a temporary student), who learned enough German to feel somehow integrated in the local geological community (well, actually, just being able to discuss some geological points, but still being considered a foreigner). The only two "negative" points were the arbitrary subdivision in sessions (more than one talk or poster ended up in the "wrong" session considering the audience and the topic), and the fact that the conference began on a Sunday quite early in the morning. A plus was the guided tour offered through the relatively small city center of Leoben. Very instructive. The biggest surprise was finding an Asian gate next to the university… even though there are no strong connections between Leoben and China. It is actually a spa.
![]() |
| St. Barbara, protector of miners and geologists |
I loved speaking "geology" again, jumping between languages and topics. Even though the conference was only focused on terrestrial features, I met a colleague of mine employed in Leoben and we talked a bit about meteorites, too. Just the week before this conference, I had attended a workshop in Vienna organized by an Austrian professor emigrated in the UK and financed by the European Research Council. It was also amazing for the quality of the talks and the scientific exchanges. The online meetings offer a great opportunity, saving money and carbon emissions, but will never replace a conference in person, also accounting for the risk of an infection. Looking forward to the next in person meeting.
… I didn't have to waiting too long. The week after, I was in Italy for the Italian equivalent of the conference in Leoben. I travelled by train, this time too, but from Padova, instead of Vienna. Italian high-speed trains are indeed faster than Austrians, touching 300 km/h. Train vs. car: 1:0, but also against airplanes, considering the time lost at airports.
The conference took place in Turin, the first capital city of Italy (when Rome was still under the power of the Pope). Every stone there is dedicated to the "Risorgimento", the movement that led to the reunification of Italy under the "French" crown of Savoy, mostly against the Austrian empire in the NE and the Bourbon dynasty in the S, and the Pope in the central Italy. The second language, after Italian, is French, still spoken by many, as much as German is (was) the second language in my hometown. As always, when I attend a conference in Italy, I swear I won’t come another time… and every time, I attend another one. The final evaluation wasn’t that negative, though, so I made a list of plus and minus about the city and the conference.
![]() |
| P.za Castello, Turin |
Plus:
- Automatic subway (existing since years and very efficient)
- green areas in the city
- drinking fountains everywhere
- delicious cookies, chocolate (pralines, like in Brussels), and ice cream
- meeting again professors of mine and colleagues from the past
- amazing science in some cases, despite the lack of funding
Minus:
- Public transit (bus and tram) and motor traffic
- conference schedule (practically from 8:30 to 7:30 pm with almost no break, but a large "nothing" between 12:30 pm and 3:30 pm)
- rooms disproportionated for the selected session, with several seats unusable because broken
- low accessibility (room at the third floor with no elevator, toilet in the basement, also without elevator, poster area ca. 1 km from the oral sessions and again with steps at the entrance)
- conference center in an almost red light district (it wasn’t, but some female "workers" were standing next to the conference center entrance also during the day)
- illogical conference program book (at least for a brain used to the German efficiency and logic…)
- last but not least.... the non-sustainable conference sponsor, which had a stand in the center of the poster area, playing music all the time, forcing us to shout in front of the posters to be heard.
In summary, in Leoben, I appreciated the scientific contributions and the location, in Turin, I enjoyed the (also scientific) chats with colleagues and meeting again people from my past (not only professors, but also colleagues, some of which moved out of academia or the country, like myself). However, I'd prefer meeting Italian colleagues in the framework of a cooperation, rather than "investing" research money in an over expensive conference. On the other hand, I'll be happy to attend again Austrian conferences in the future.
(Sotto in italiano)
If there was no pandemic, I would have flown to Chicago to attend in person the 84th Meeting of the Meteoritical Society, as in the tradition. Well, perhaps not, because this year, we got a very reduced amount of travel funding. The last year, the annual meeting had been cancelled/postponed. This year, the organizers created something unique: a hybrid conference, giving the opportunity to attend it in person and remotely. Months ago, I didn’t think to register, even virtually, because I had nothing to present (after one year pandemic), but then something came out and I decided to register for the virtual attendance, also to support the great work of the organizers.
The pre-conference poster presentation went just fine. We had the great opportunity to increase the visibility of our posters with a 3 minutes live talk and 2 minutes live questions, but unfortunately only a few people attended the two sessions planned. The actual conference was hold according to the time zone of Chicago, which means between 3:30 pm and 11:30 pm in Europe. All the evening events were too late for the European time, but it will be possible to check them later during the year. Changing session, instead of physically changing room, required loading another webpage. The first part of talks were given live by speakers in the audience and the second part consisted of pre-recorded talks, whose speakers were connected live for the questions, which were asked both by people in the room, as usual, and by the remote audience, but by e-mail. These latter questions were read live by the chairmen. It sounds complicated, but after the initial skepticism it worked pretty well.
Honestly, we are all tired of online conferences! However, seeing real people in a room (wearing a mask and dealing with the restrictions dictated by the pandemic) contributes to increase our resilience and patience. The broadcasting was professionally done and for sure was not cheap. As remarked in the society meeting, the registration fees won’t cover all the costs for such a hybrid conference. However, I hope that this hybrid mode will survive the pandemic, to give the opportunity to attend overseas conference to scientists (not only students) with limited funding. I missed indeed the social events and the interactions in front of the posters, but better this way than no conference at all!
_._._._._._
In altri tempi, avrei raccontato qui del mio viaggio a Chicago per partecipare ad un convegno internazionale. La pandemia ha costretto gli organizzatori a cancellare l’evento l’anno scorso ed ha proporne una versione ibrida quest’anno, ossia in presenza per i locali (e chi può viaggiare) ed online per gli altri. All’inizio pensavo di non prendervi parte, non avendo alcun risultato significativo da presentare. Poi, invece, visto che contribuivo alla presentazione di qualche collega, ho creduto opportuno seguire almeno la versione online, sia per sostenere gli organizzatori e sia per essere aggiornata sulle novità nel settore. Eccomi quindi a raccontare di questo convegno con viaggio virtuale negli USA, senza ore di volo, camere condivise con colleghi e cambio di alimentazione, ma solo con orari da altro fuso, comodamente seduta a casetta in Austria e da sola (o meglio, collegata via chat con i colleghi per commentare in diretta).
Sessione poster pre-convegno
Non potendo avere una sessione poster ibrida e prevedendo che per alcuni (specialmente gli europei) una sessione poster in orario reale sarebbe stata troppo tardi, gli organizzatori hanno ideato una sessione poster virtuale qualche giorno prima del convegno, in cui gli interessati potevano presentare il proprio lavoro e rispondere alle eventuali domande in slot di 5 minuti. Purtroppo si trattava di due sessioni parallele, per cui dovendo presentare in una non ho potuto seguire l’altra. L’idea in sé è bella ed ha dato la possibilità di aumentare la visibilità dei poster altrimenti dimenticati tra i contenuti online, ma purtroppo è stata poco sentita. Erano collegati principalmente solo quelli che dovevano presentare e data la varietà di argomenti non ci sono state grandi discussioni scientifiche, nella maggior parte dei casi non c’erano nemmeno domande oltre a quelle dei convener.
![]() |
| Train at Chicago airport. Seen in 2017. |
Primo giorno
Con alcuni minuti di ritardo, la trasmissione è iniziata e, nonostante i timori iniziali, pure il cambio di sessione ha funzionato. Unico neo della prima sessione è stato forse il tempo dedicato alle domande, in cui hanno mescolato domande giunte via e-mail dal pubblico "a casa" e quelle in presenza, rivolte sia ai relatori precedenti sia a quelli pre-registrati e collegati via zoom. Un po’ di confusione e qualche silenzio imbarazzante, ma era la prima volta per tutti, credo. Meglio così che non avere proprio la possibilità di fare domande, anche se ero abituata alle dirette zoom, in cui tutti si era online.
La sessione pomeridiana, ossia dopocena, è stata duretta, sia per l’orario, sia perché la stragrande maggioranza delle presentazioni era pre-registrata e sia per l’ampiezza e la diversità dei temi affrontati. 2h30 senza pause e poi quasi 30 minuti di domande, quando la sottoscritta alle 22 solitamente è già nel mondo dei sogni da tempo. Chattando e commentando in contemporanea con un paio di colleghi, come forse avrei fatto anche in presenza. Intanto infuriava una tempesta estiva, ma per fortuna la connessione internet ha retto. Finalmente alle 23:30 ho potuto spegnere il computer. Niente Barringer Lecture stavolta, troppo tardi.
Secondo giorno
Nella mattinata col fuso europeo ho concluso poco, prevalentemente corrispondenza in tedesco. Alle 15:30 (in Europa) è iniziata la sessione sugli impatti, che mi ha dato la possibilità di rivedere il mio ex-capo viennese, ma dall’altra parte della Terra. Sono abituata a vederlo in TV in Austria, il convegno virtuale non è molto differente. Intanto ho preso coraggio ed ho inviato un paio di domande via e-mail, poi lette in diretta dai coordinatori della sessione. Dopocena (nel pomeriggio a Chicago) mi sono trasferita virtualmente su Marte. Sessione più popolata e movimentata di quella sugli impatti, ma alle 22 sono crollata dal sonno.
Terzo giorno
Solo mezza giornata di convegno virtuale per la consegna dei vari premi, permettendomi di mandare avanti il lavoro nel resto della giornata. Doppia cerimonia di premiazione per recuperare quella dell’anno scorso. Non potevo perdermela, visto che il mio ex-capo ha ricevuto un premio! Certo, un po’ triste in una sala semivuota e con metà dei premiati collegati online o con presentazioni pre-registrate.
Quarto giorno
Presentazione del nostro lavoro tramite un collega, ma poche domande nella discussione. Nella pausa pranzo (in realtà cena in Europa) c’è stata la riunione della Meteoritical Society. Trovo l’evoluzione interessante. Nota a margine, il presidente uscente è donna ed americana, il nuovo presidente è donna e francese. La società mineralogica austriaca (ÖMG) ha pure una presidentessa e ci sono parecchi cambiamenti in programma. Coincidenza? :)
Quinto giorno
Ultimo giorno del convegno. Al mattino (in Europa) ho trascorso oltre tre ore ad un incontro online al museo in tedesco, per poi passare al convegno dalle 15:30. Giornata decisamente piena. La stanchezza si percepisce, non solo da parte mia. L’ultimo giorno del convegno è sempre "stanco" ed avere una presentazione orale il venerdì pomeriggio, quando molti partecipanti se ne sono già andati, è considerato una sfortuna. Domani sarebbe previsto un workshop interessante, ma passo. Le informazioni fornite soddisferebbero solo la mia curiosità, ma non contribuirebbero alla mia ricerca o al mio lavoro. In ogni caso sono soddisfatta, ho già raccolto parecchi spunti dal convegno e mi sono ricaricata di entusiasmo per vari temi di ricerca. Non è stato nemmeno paragonabile ad un convegno di persona, ma come si dice dalle mie parti "piuttosto che niente, meglio piuttosto".
![]() |
| da qui |
![]() |
| Campus of the Hokkaido University |
![]() |
| The famous canal strolling in Otaru |
![]() |
| Minima distanza raggiunta dal Duomo. Ovviamente, cantiere del tram. |
![]() |
| La TU di Berlino, tra storia e modernità |
![]() |
| L'edificio in cui soggiornavo. Il primo di tre uguali. |
![]() |
| Belgium? No, Germany. |
![]() |
| the Rhine |
![]() |
| Wherever I go... I find a pipe organ. |